Culpable Homicide and Murder: Differences under IPC

Culpable Homicide and Murder: Differences under IPC

This article on ‘Culpable Homicide and Murder: Differences under IPC‘ was written by Muskan Kumari, an intern at Legal Upanishad.


Individuals had been killed even before history began being recorded so that we could see. Today, killing another individual is one of the gravest offenses. The wrongdoing is Known as a homicide. Culpable homicide and murder are two terms ordinarily used to characterize this wrongdoing. The distinctions between these two terms are little yet essential to the general set of laws while apportioning equity to the casualties of these grave violations. Culpable homicide can likewise be a legitimate crime.

Likewise, with some other wrongdoing, murder is a wrongdoing against an individual as well as the general public at a large. It wrongs the harmony and could cause frenzy and delirium in general society, particularly when the chronic executioner is believed to be free.

The most straightforward method for putting the distinctions between culpable homicide and murder is that all violations of murder are inside the extent of culpable homicide, yet not all culpable homicide tends to murder.

Meaning of homicide

Culpable homicide means causing demise by doing anything determined to cause passing or incurring actual harm that is probably going to cause passing or realizing that he is probably going to cause demise by following through with something like that.

It is divided into two kinds:

  1. Legitimate Homicide

A guilty party for a Homicide can’t be chargeable all the time. This surmises the possibility of legitimate murder where the denounced had a substantial motivation to do the bad behaviour or wrongdoing. In these cases, the individual won’t, by and large, be charged by the law and can in like manner be absolved from the charges.

  1. Illegitimate Homicide

These are the passing caused by self-security of self-protection or misstep of reality or on the other hand on the off chance that there was a bonafide execution of the law, etc. Subsequently, Homicide can be authentic and comparably unlawful. Legal Homicide might integrate sensible and forgivable homicide. Unlawful Homicide might consolidate passing by rash and imprudent demonstration (Section 304-A), self-destruction (Section 309), or punishable manslaughter.

Meaning of Culpable Homicide

Culpable Homicide is derived from the Latin expression homi (man) and I do (cut). Crime basically signifies “the killing of a person by one more individual.” The term Culpable Homicide alludes to the demonstrated action of causing or hurrying the passing of a person by another individual. Be that as it may, not all murders are unlawful or criminal.

The demise of an aggressor is brought about by an honest specialist, like a kid under the time of watchfulness (doli incapax) or an individual with an unstable psyche, or the passing of the attacker caused by the activity of the right of private safeguard isn’t unlawful. In the first, the culprit is ‘pardoned,’ yet in the second, the respondent’s activities are ‘legitimized.’

Categorized into two parts:

  • Culpable Homicide amounting to murder
  • Culpable Homicide does not amount to murder

Important ingredients of culpable homicide

  • An individual should be dead.
  • Death has probably been brought about by the demonstration of someone else.
  • The demonstration causing death probably been finished with:
  1. The expectation of causing parsing
  2. The goal of causing real injury prone to causing passing
  3. With the information that such a demonstration is probably going to cause passing.

Illustration based on Culpable Homicide

X doesn’t have any idea about brain cancer. While playing with Y, X hits Y to cause death. The pain started and Y died because of brain cancer. X would be liable for culpable homicide.


The expression “Murder” derives from the Germanic word “mouth” and that implies secret killing. Murder means when one individual is killed by someone else or a gathering of people who have a pre-decided goal to end the life of someone else.

An offence won’t add up to ‘Murder’ except if it incorporates an offence that falls under the meaning of at-fault crime according to the meaning of ‘Homicide’ under IPC. All murders are at fault manslaughter yet all crimes are not murders. Section 299 and Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code manage murder.

Important elements of murder

  • Intention: Must be intended to cause death
  • Cause of Death: The act has to be done with the knowledge that the act may cause the death of another.
  • Bodily injury: There must be intent to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.

Punishment for murder

  • Death penalty
  • Life imprisonment
  • Fine

The Illustrations are based on murder

If X wants to kill Y because of property. X shoots Y having the intention to kill him. As a result, we found that B died because of bullet shoots by X then, we can say murder is committed by X.

Exception of section 300 of the Indian penal code

  • Grave and sudden provocation
  • Private defence
  • Premeditation in sudden fights and
  • Consent in case of euthanasia.
Culpable Homicide and Murder: Differences under IPC
Culpable Homicide and Murder: Differences under IPC

Case Laws

  1. KM Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1961)

Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati is a Navy officer. He was charged with the Murder of Prem Ahuja under section 302 and section 304. At the point when the litigant was away for his work, his wife Sylvia, supported an illegal relationship with Mr. Ahuja, a companion of Nanavati.

On 27th April 1959, Nanavati got back from one of his long journeys. At the point when he returned home, his significant other appeared to be acting oddly and was not responsive or warm to him. Detecting something, he asked, to which Sylvia admitted her issue with Ahuja. That night, Nanavati dropped Sylvia (spouse) and their two youngsters at a film lobby and went to stand up to Ahuja. He initially went to his boat, gathered his gun in a misleading guise from the stores alongside six slugs, finished his authority obligations, and went on for Prem Ahuja’s office.

On not finding him there, he advanced toward Ahuja’s home where he tracked down Ahuja. There was a verbal showdown between the two men. After the showdown, there was a fight after which three shots were discharged and Prem Ahuja fell down and died. Nanavati went directly to admit to the Provost Marshal of the Western Naval Command and later surrendered himself to the Deputy Commissioner of Police.

The jury viewed him not liable for homicide which didn’t find favour with the Sessions Judge and he alluded the case to the Bombay High Court. The Bombay High Court excused the Jury’s choice and sentenced Nanavati under section 302 and section 304 of IPC.

Nanavati recorded a pursuit under the watchful eye of the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court maintained that this was an unmistakable instance of planned murder and agreed with the choice of the High Court and condemned him to life detainment for a chargeable crime amounting to murder.

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Dhool Singh

The Supreme Court viewed the blame blameworthy for murder for causing a chiseled cut with a blade on the neck, bringing about unnecessary draining and organ disappointment, in light of the fact that he knew the substantial injury he caused would probably bring about the death of the person.

  1. Reddy Sampath Kumar v. State

The Apex Court allowed the denounced, a specialist, who participated in many killings of his parents-in-law, to be condemned to live in prison. The court, be that as it may, banished him from gathering any reductions on propitious events to act as an obstruction. Likewise, in the Lehna case (2002), the Supreme Court pronounced capital punishment forced by the preliminary court and maintained by the high court on the blamed for killing his mom, sibling, and sister by marriage to be illegal and driven it to life detainment, thinking that the various homicides, while merciless, were not the consequence of fiendish and evil preparation.

Difference between Culpable Homicide and Murder

MurderCulpable  Homicide
It involves section 299 of the Indian penal code.It involves section 300 of the Indian penal code.
All murders can be termed as culpable homicide.All culpable homicide cannot be termed as Murder.
The degree of punishment is higher.The degree of punishment is not higher.  


However, both the ideas of homicide and murder appear to be the same in a specific sense they Contrast in the part of the level of likelihood of death or it very well may be said as the reality of demonstration of the wrongdoing.

There are developing dangers to ladies and youngsters by violations like assault and murder. The news report says that these crime percentages increment step by step. To determine this, the regulations will consider giving obstacle hypothesis and disciplines referenced in it. Thus, may be a reduction in the crime rates. When there is an increase in punishments, there is a decrease in crimes. Murder is a crime for which the punishment may be prescribed as the death penalty with the implementation of the deterrent theory.

List of References: